nawok's rance

Man Who Stomped 6 Year Old Girl To Death Arrested Again

2005-05-25T14:02:00.000-07:00

lionel tate, the ever infamous boy who stomped a 6 year old girl to death when he was 12 is going back (yes, he was released) to prison. He claimed he saw that action on wrestling. I bet his claim for this will be "I saw it on cops".

Antarctic Gets Bigger

2005-05-20T17:55:00.000-07:00

It seems with the clean air causing global warming and the environment being destroyed and all, the Antarctic is getting bigger. But the article goes into great detail about how the environment is indeed worsening. Oh well, guess we should just make our air dirtier to fix it...

Illegal Alien Shoots Two Cops, One Dies

2005-05-14T19:41:00.000-07:00

The Great Washington Times have an article out today about an illegal alien that shot two off duty police officers. How many people are going to have to die before we close our borders? The Mexican government can go to hell, they are helping the illegals cross (link is an instructional comic book put out by the Mexican government. Here is an english version). If they want to come over, that's great, just be legal! It's called illegal for a reason!

Saddam Gave Money To The Chirac Re-Election Campaign

2005-05-14T19:17:00.000-07:00

Hat Tip to The Right Side of the Rainbow for this one. The article discusses how saddam spies offered bribes to the chirac campaign to get him re-elected. This just goes to show that saddam loved chirac's anti-Americanism so much, he wanted to keep him in power. The article also says that the Iraqi intelligence agency of the time called the spokeswoman for chirac a "friend of Iraq". france of course, denies it all happened. Also a nice sidenote, the documents that revealed the deal were found during a US House of Rep. meeting about the UN Oil for Food scandal. Hmm...

Comments

2005-05-14T19:15:00.000-07:00

Commenting will be re-enabled soon. Come back to post!

Having An Abortion Increases Risk Of Premature Birth In Future Pregnancies

2005-05-14T18:23:00.000-07:00

A French study (don't get too excited, it's appearing in a British magazine, and that's a British link) released recently found that women who have had a previous abortion have a 1.7 times higher chance of having a dangerously premature birth in later pregnancies. Not only does an abortion deny the one child its right to life, it puts later kids at risk. You know none of this would ever happen if we taught abstinence and people didn't have sex unless they were ready to deal with kids. Just another example of how abortion is a sick, sick practice.

BBC Sides With The Terrorists

2005-05-14T18:02:00.000-07:00

I heard the theme to the Twilight Zone playing as I read about the new BBC series that conspirarizes how the threat of terrorism is just a veil used by "the American neo-conservatives" to keep themselves in power. Here are some quotes:

In a new series, the Power of Nightmares explores how the idea that we are threatened by a hidden and organised [sic] terrorist network is an illusion.

It is a myth that has spread unquestioned through politics, the security services and the international media.

At the heart of the story are two groups: the American neo-conservatives and the radical Islamists.

Both were idealists who were born out of the failure of the liberal dream to build a better world.

...

The Islamists were faced by the refusal of the masses to follow their dream and began to turn to terror to force the people to "see the truth"'.

The last line makes the terrorists seem like victims of a society that doesn't understand them. Poor terrorists, if only we could understand them. That sounds kind of like what neville chamberlain said about hitler.

To say that terrorism is a "myth" is just wrong. I don't think I have to source 9/11, or the WTC bombings of 1993, or the countless attacks of embassies. Let me remind BBC that one of their reporters was killed in Mogadishu by terrorists, and a cameraman was killed and another reporter seriously injured during a driveby by terrorists. (source) I'm sure if we were to ask one of them if terrorism exists, they would say it sure as hell does.

Kofi Annan In Oil-For-Food Cover Up?

2005-05-13T20:06:00.000-07:00

Good ol Fox News reported this today. The article reviews a series of reports by the oil for food scandal investigator. It goes on to describe how later version excluded certain points about kofi annan. Some quotes:

The final report also didn't mention that Annan had originally denied knowing one of his son's business associates with whom he had had lunch.

...

Parton (the lead investigator) sought to make an issue of Annan's veracity, concluding the U.N. chief wasn't initially forthcoming and his story evolved as new facts emerged. Parton also noted Annan's account sometimes conflicted with other witnesses deemed credible.

...

In his first of four interviews with investigators, Annan did not disclose last November that he met in September 1998 with his son Kojo and Cotecna consultant Pierre Mouselli — and then, two weeks later, with Cotecna's chief executive Eli Massey — as the company was gearing up to bid for business under the Oil-for-Food program.

The article then says that after reviewing his schedule and calendar, kofi told of the meetings. I don't want to blatantly say that's not true, but 4 meetings, with his son, and his son's business is gearing up to bid on the oil for food program? Don't you think that would have come up? Not to be a scandal monger, but something isn't right here. Do I think there is a cover up? Of course, the UN is so awash in scandal it's ridiculous, and this is just an example.

Condoms Given Away At Middle School Health Fair

2005-05-11T11:58:00.000-07:00

A link off Drudge today talks about middle schoolers getting free condoms at a health fair the school sponsored. Apparently, the fair was about drugs and alcohol, but an AIDS group was there distributing condoms to these kids. The administrators say they didn't know it was happening. I wonder why the administrators invited an AIDS group to an event about the dangers of drugs and alcohol, and why the group distributed condoms at said event. The UNDERAGED (ie: not even legally allowed to buy condoms or have sex) kids are getting mixed messages. This mixed message says that they can break the law and have underaged sex. Abstinence is the only way people. I know, some kids are going to have sex anyways, they will probably wear condoms, and if they don't... well, they should have thought about that before they had sex.

Democrats Still Trying To Allow Gays To Marry

2005-05-08T18:49:00.000-07:00

The Washington Times caught my attention today in an article about the democrat's and their plan to legalize gay marriage. The article talks about how the party is split on the issue, quoting john kerry and howard dean. The Republican party has long attacked the democrats for not being united, for infighting, and generally not having a plan for anything (ie: social security). This is just another example of a party about to fall apart.

Economy Doing Much Better Than Expected

2005-05-06T11:15:00.000-07:00

An article in Routers today discusses the booming economy. Some points:

Jobs added in April were 274,000, well above the expected 170,00.
The numbers for February and March were revised up. From 110,000 in March, to 146,00, and from 243,000 to 300,000 in April.
Democrats and the media say the economy is "slowing down"
Unemployment stayed the same (but didn't go up).

Of course you won't hear this in the news because everyone is too busy gawking at the "run-away bride". Anyways, there you have it, the Bush economic plan is working better than expected. Now I have to get my hands on one of these.

Does It Ever End?

2005-05-05T18:33:00.000-07:00

On Drudge today is an article about the Earth's cleaner air (despite what you might be lead on to think). The article then goes on to say that cleaner air will actually cause more global warming. I don't think these environmentalists will be happy until we all ride bikes (and they will still complain about the petroleum based tires), live in huts, and never cook anything. But wait, that would make the air cleaner, and isn't that bad for the environment??? The modern environmental movement is so backwards and oxymoronic it hurts. The cause is good, but the way they go about it is a bit skewed, like handing this out to grade school kids. (source is newsweek, or google it)

Brain Damaged Fireman Recovers After 10 Years

2005-05-04T12:13:00.000-07:00

Sean Hannity is talking about it. A brain damaged fireman suddenly wishes to speak to his wife after almost 10 years. I hope you're thinking Terri Schiavo. Here is a list of things he doesn't have in common with Terri (I'm using "not in common" because this is what the liberals will use to say that this case is nothing like Terri):

This guy was unresponsive. Terri was, watch the videos.
He was blind, Terri wasn't.
This man had a loving family. Terri obviously didn't.
He had physical therapy, given to him by his loving family. Terri did not get any therapy.

In short, this guy recovered from being worse off than Terri. He did so because his family loved him and tried to help him recover. The doctors called it "amazing" and "unheard of". There is a chance, do not deprive people of that chance.

Condi Threatens North Korea

2005-05-03T16:36:00.000-07:00

In a Washington Times article Condi Rice told North Korean what's up. Some quotes from the article:

"I don't think anyone is confused about the ability of the United States to deter -- both on behalf of itself and on behalf of its allies -- North Korean nuclear ambitions or gains on the peninsula," Miss Rice said during an appearance at the State Department with French Foreign Minister Michel Barnier. "We have, after all, a very strong alliance with South Korea and a very strong alliance with Japan. And, of course, the United States maintains significant -- and I want to underline significant -- deterrent capability of all kinds in the Asia-Pacific region," she added. "So I don't think there should be any doubt about our ability to deter whatever the North Koreans are up to."

I sense a little bit of TR in Condi. She basically told Korea that America will kick it's ass if it has to. kim jong (mentally) il better watch himself, I think Condi is serious. This is why I supported Condi. She is patriotic, strong-willed, and not afraid of anything. The UN can whine all they want about Condi, but she is going to stay her course. Finally, America has another person who isn't afraid to use military force against these terrorists.

Pedophilia, The New Common Cold?

2005-05-01T15:51:00.000-07:00

I have stumbled across a video on CNN(right side, under health) with the title, "Is pedophilia an illness or a crime?". Is this what the liberal media has come to? Now raping children is comparable to the common cold? Is there going to be a "Pedophiles Anonymous"? Why is this even a question? Anyone who has sex with an unconsenting/underaged person should be punished, hard. To defend pedophilia like this is an atrocity. Pedophilia will always be a serious crime. Anyone who cannot control themselves clearly have other issues and should not be allowed to mingle with society. Let's think back to Jessica Lunsford's killer. It's this kind of pseudonym that brings about the "rehabilitate, not punish" mind set. I don't know about anyone else here, but when I was a child, I was rehabilitated real quick when my dad took his belt off.

UN Peacekeepers Sexually Abused Liberian Girls

2005-05-01T15:00:00.000-07:00

The Jerusalem Post has an article on another UN sex scandal. It describes how up to 20 allegations have surfaced against the UN peacekeeping troops in Liberia. What's interesting here is what the UN does about it; nothing:

"Currently, UN troops and employees accused of wrongdoing are sent home, and are confronted by their own government but are often never punished."

Why doesn't the UN punish these guys? Because they are troops of another government? Well then somehow punish that government. Pass another slap on the wrist resolution of unhappyness or something. Typical of the UN to make someone else do their work for them...

This isn't the only sex scandal that "peacekeeping" troops have been involved in;

"UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan commissioned the report after more than 150 allegations of sexual exploitation of girls as young as 13 by UN peacekeepers in Congo surfaced."

So now we know just what the UN does...

Hat Tip: http://rrwr.blogspot.com/

Just A Reminder...

2005-05-01T05:44:00.000-07:00

A Router's article reveals that another 1500 bodies were found in a mass grave in Iraq:

Most of the victims were women and children who were apparently lined up in front of the pits and shot with AK-47 assault rifles, according to a U.S. investigator.

Around 110 bodies have been excavated from the site so far, nearly two thirds of them children and teenagers.
...

It is one of around 300 suspected mass graves that have been discovered around Iraq since Saddam was overthrown. Some contain as few as a dozen bodies, while others, including one near the southern city of Basra, contain several thousand.

In the area around Samawa, a largely Shi'ite Muslim town where Saddam cracked down against locals after an uprising in 1991, 27 suspected grave sites have been found.

If he had WMD's, I'd think that would just be a bonus. One must remember that saddam did use biological and chemical weapons against his own people in 1988. Even if he didn't have WMD's (unlikely), we still ended this.

NAACP Scandal (again)

2005-04-28T12:10:00.000-07:00

In a recently released report, frizzell gray (aka: kweisi mfume) is accused of giving raises and benefits to female employees with which he had a close personal relation (sounds kinda like jessie jackson). This comes on the heels of Benjamin F. Chavis Jr.'s giving of $332,400 of NAACP funds to a female employee who accused him of sexual discrimination (ie: the same thing they exist to fight against).

What I can't seem to understand about the NAACP is their oxymoronic existence. They try to get "equality" and eliminate differences between races. Yet, by their very being they acknowledge and live on the very thing they are trying to eliminate, that there is a difference. I bet if we founded a white people's advancement association, the NAACP would sue it for being racist and unconstitutional. The problem with that is that I'm serious.

New Bill Makes It Harder To Get An Abortion

2005-04-28T11:58:00.000-07:00

A new bill passed recently makes it illegal to take a girl across state lines to get an abortion without parental consent. I know it's not big, but it's a step closer.Unfortunately, it is still legal in some states to get an abortion without parental consent. This is wrong, since it is usually the parents that end up footing the bill for the child. It also encourages pre-marital and underage sex, since the parents still wouldn't know. Passing a law the requires parental consent would make a lot of kids think twice before being morons.

Filibusters

2005-04-23T11:15:00.000-07:00

So the new issue is filibusters, never mind the booming economy or the war in Iraq, there's no bad news there, there is only news in Bush nominating Michael Bolton as the UN Ambassador. But that's not the real issue. The real one is the democrat's attempt to filibuster to prevent his nomination. Filibusters are unconstitutional, and obstruct the democratic process, no matter who uses them. When the American people vote a person into office, they want that person's policies to be put into action. Voting people they want into office is a basic American right. Filibusters take away that right by giving the minority (ie: not the majority; as in POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY and RULE BY MAJORITY, two Constitutional Rights) power to overrule the majority and prevent the policies that the people want put into place from being passed. The practice should be banned as it is an affront to the people's wishes, and to quote Ronald Reagan, "Our Constitution is a document that protects the people from the government". The Constitution is supposed to prevent this kind of thing! Never mind that ted kennedy and most other major democrats voted to ban fillibusters in 1995! But it's not just democrats, both sides are guilty of this, and it has to stop.

Zarqawi Now A Nucular Threat

2005-04-20T18:11:00.000-07:00

A new article published by the Washington Times reveals that abu musab zablabla is now a nuclear threat. For those of you who don't know, abu musab zawhatever is the leader of the terrorists in Iraq. Now Bush will be criticized for letting it happen. It never ends.

The biggest thing about going into Iraq was what? WMD's. Liberals and the UN did everything they could to stall for a full year to let saddam get ready for his ass kicking. Then they tried everything in their power to hinder the war effort. Now zarqawi has a nuclear bomb. I thought they never existed, or they would never use them. I hope all you liberals feel good about yourselves. Not to say "see, I told you so" or anything...

$17 Mill. Homeless shelter built in LA

2005-04-19T11:49:00.000-07:00

Mike Gallagher was talking about this yesterday, and today Drudge had it on his site. It's an article about a brand new homeless shelter in LA. This 17 million dollar money hole comes complete with a hair salon, gymnasium, showers, cafeteria, library, an education center and other luxuries for LA's 6000 homeless people. If I lived in LA, and one cent of my taxes went into that, I would be madder than a libertarian after the most recent bill to legalize weed failed.

The article does a pretty good job with talking about how this Mirage will do more harm than good. They discuss the "why would I want a job if I can just stay here" aspect. These people no longer have any incentive to try to become non-homeless because they have a 5 star resort to stay at, for free! I want the rest of the country to pay for my house too! Imagine the single mother, 3 jobs, 3 kids, and no child support. Why would she keep those jobs when she could up her standard of living by moving to this Bellagio? This is going to create more homeless people if anything, and what are they gonna do about that? That's right, build more free Rivieras.

Imagine giving that $17 million to businesses as incentives to grow. A tax break for hiring new employees maybe. Wait, tha'ts a conservative idea... evil conservatives. Seriously though, I did some math. There are 6000 homeless people in LA. The new Monte Carlo costs $17 million. That's $2833 per person. California is in a 3-way tie for the 7th highest minimum wage in the country, with $6.75 an hour. (source) Working a mere 40 hour week, someone could make over $14,000 a year. It would take just over 10 weeks to earn the $2833 that they had spent on them. It would actually help the homeless people more to spend the 17 million on getting them a job than it would to get into the exponentially dangerous habit of building these Excaliburs.

I won't even mention the communism of using other people's hard earned money to buy these people housing. I think Ahnold should smash zee facileetee wiv hiz mahzzels!!!

Vacation!

2005-04-11T19:12:00.000-07:00

Going on vacation until Sunday. Have fun until then!

Political Fallout from Terri Schiavo?

2005-04-10T18:03:00.000-07:00

This is the only thing I'm gonna write about Terri Schiavo, because I personally got tired of hearing the same things over and over. Don't think I'm downplaying the case, but why wasn't I hearing about the economy or unemployment(PDF file, sorry, I hate them too. It says the unemployment rate fell to 5.2%.)?

The other thing that is all over the news is the so called "political fallout" from the Schiavo case. Everyone (by everyone I mean .00001% of the population that makes up liberal news "analysts") keeps saying that the Republicans are going to suffer politically from the case. They say that it wasn't right for Congress to get involved. Separation of powers politics vote mongering conspiracy Then I turned the TV off. This raised some question in my mind:

Where were the Democrats in all of this? I didn't see any liberals get involved except for a few taking the side of death.
What would these "analysts" say if the Republicans didn't do anything about it? I'm guessing it would be somewhere along the lines of "they don't care about this (suddenly) suffering woman. They are the majority, why don't they do something and save her?"
What else could the Republicans have done short of sending in the National Guard? Wait, we did that. The point is, we couldn't have done anything else to save her.
What exactly about this is political? Except that we are trying to stand up for what we believe in? Trying to further our agenda of life? Wouldn't it be blatant hypocrisy to stand idle and watch her die while wearing pro-life wrist bands and taking the positions that we do?
Who is really politicizing this? What about the liberals claiming that the Republicans shouldn't have used Congress and that it is unconstitutional? That's more politicizing than anything we have done!

I just hope that the American people are smart enough to see past the two-face part of people saying stuff like this. Don't let polls dictate your positions! Remember, Thomas Jefferson and George Washington were right wing extremists...

Boo!

2005-04-10T15:27:00.000-07:00

I'm back, sorry for the break. I will get some commentary going again soon, so keep emailing me and calling me a bigot. Rather that than wrong.

Killer Of 9 Year Old Worked At Her School

2005-03-25T07:39:00.000-08:00

In another revelation by the killer of 9 year old Jessica Lunsford, he said he worked at her school, and took other jobs that exposed him to children. He goes on to say that prison "won't cure his desires. " The penalties for crimes such as these should be harsher, this guy is sick.

Let Freedom Ring

2005-03-24T17:54:00.000-08:00

I know we are all getting rocky about the war in Iraq, but that's what the terrorists want. In my travels through cyberspace, I stumbled across a link that restored my faith in the war. http://www.untoldiraq.org is a great site that tells the war from the Iraqi side, not a 3rd person view that is the media, but from a 1st person perspective, a person effected by what we have done so far. Democrats whine "they don't want us there" or "we aren't doing any good" and "why did we fight this war?". We can counter with facts, other than "what if's"

71% of Iraqis in a February 2004 survey that said they expected their lives to be even better in a year.

Don't think "but only 71%?". First off, that's almost 3/4th, and I'm pretty sure the terrorists aren't too happy, and the date is February of 2004. The improvement has just begun.

One thing that never fails in making me doubt liberal's intelligence is "this is taking too long". Mind you, it took about 10 years to get our Constitution in place. These guys want things done 6 months after a complete removal of a regime. How long did it take Germany to recover from it's ass whipping in World War 2? Or the fall of the USSR? Things take time, in the end, I promise it will all work out.

Terri Schiavo

2005-03-19T17:30:00.000-08:00

I invite you all to take a look at a few videos. Mainly this one. I want you all to look at those and tell me that she is in a "persistent vegetative state". She is responsive, she even smiles in a couple movies. Here are some links that relate to Terri's fight:

http://www.blogsforterri.com/
http://www.terrisfight.org/
http://www.wf-f.org/TerriSchiavo.html
Both side's in a great article

Not To Say I Told You So...

2005-03-18T19:05:00.000-08:00

Source:

A registered sex offender with an extensive criminal history has confessed to kidnapping and killing 9-year-old Jessica Lunsford, who disappeared from her bedroom more than three weeks ago, authorities said Friday.

...

Couey's criminal record includes 24 arrests for burglary, carrying a concealed weapon, indecent exposure and other offenses. In 1991, he was arrested in Kissimmee on a charge of fondling a child under age 16. Records don't show how the case was resolved.

During a house burglary in 1978, he was accused of grabbing a girl in her bedroom, placing his hand over her mouth and kissing her, Citrus County sheriff Jeff Dawsy said. Couey was sentenced to 10 years in prison but was paroled in 1980, a time when inmates were serving a small fraction of their sentences

Why is this guy even alive? Twenty-four arrests for burglary? I guess the 25th times a charm. This guy should have been in prison, isolated from society. Absolutely disgusting.

What Have We Done With Innocence?

2005-03-16T13:38:00.000-08:00

Justice is one of the founding principals of our country. So where is it? Our justice system is so disgusting in this country, that people who haven't done anything are getting punished, and people that have done things are getting off.

We all hate frivolous law suits that jack up insurance prices and doctor fees and what not, so I won't talk about that. The biggest problem is in the prisons. These things turn into minimum security resorts more than detention facilities. Prisons are NOT to rehabilitate criminals, or to make a dozen TV shows about when some moronic rich white women is sentenced to 6 months for lying about stock reports (reminds me, there should be a charge called "general idiocy"), they are to punish them for infringing on someone else's basic human rights. I'm so sick of liberals trying to rehabilitate criminals.

(I can't believe I had to type "-martha" in the search engine...) Prison should be hard. These people hurt society. They infringe on your rights. They should be punished, hard. The hardest thing to get into a prison isn't prisoners though, it's funding.

Everyone thinks prison funding is a great idea, until they have to do their taxes. The biggest thing that can be done about prison funding is eliminating the things the prisoners get. I'm talking no gyms, no cuisines, no TVs etc. etc. Prisoners are there because they broke the law, they should be treated as such.

Now this is going to sound disgusting and wrong, but I'm gonna say it. Death row prisoners should be killed faster. These guys take other people's lives, the most basic right every human is born with. Most of the time they kill more than one person, then they get to sit around for 30 years. Get them out of the system, taking care of them for their lives costs money, money they don't deserve. This is much like welfare, except we pay their whole way.

The biggest argument against capital punishment is the cost. It does indeed cost more to condemn a criminal to death than it does to sentence them for life. It's the reasoning behind this argument that matters though. It costs more due to the money sucking appeals, and the big security measures that are used for death row criminals. *scrolls up* Hmm... yep... I defiantly just said that executing death row criminals faster will save money. And I also said that the justice system needs reform. I like reform.

Eliminating countless appeals, and stupid court room drama crap like motions and delays and what not would not only save us money, it would also make the justice system faster. Robert Blake's wife was killed May 4th, 2001. His trial ended today, March 16th, 2005. That's almost 4 years in between the crime and the trial. Evidence could have been lost, witnesses could have died in that time! "But innocent people will die" That's unavoidable. But more innocent people are going to die due to this slow system!

Bring justice back to our legal system. Criminals deserve everything they get. They separate themselves from the honest and law abiding citizens of society when they break a law, and they should be punished for it. Oh and those stupid warning labels... those should be removed and the morons that don't know not to iron their clothes while wearing them should be left to suffer from their own idiocy.

Courtesy of the Red, White, and Blue

2005-03-14T13:14:00.000-08:00

So in surfing the internet today, I found a site that features photo messages of Americans saying stuff like "we are sorry that Bush got elected, we tried". Well, I'm not sorry.

I'm sorry that America was attacked on September 11th. I'm sorry that evil exists in this world. I'm sorry we had to kick saddam and osama's ass. Wait, no I'm not. osama and saddam brought that on themselves, just like anyone that attacks innocent countries. nazi Germany is the most obvious example. I am sorry nazi germany had to exist. I am not sorry for beating them all across Europe and Africa. I am not sorry for defending my country, and never will be.

The world whines like a bad girlfriend whenever America does something. It almost seems that we are wrong just because we are America. Yes, we do live in a world where foreign relations aren't so foreign anymore, and every move a country makes is felt by the rest. What the world has to understand here is that America is the greatest country in the world. Don't believe me? Neither did saddam... or japan... or hitler (no picture for him, cuz he's DEAD).

I am sick of people saying America is the bad guy. Lets go back and look at what America has done:
Introduced democracy to the modern world. Now nearly every major country has some form of democracy.
Has been a beacon of freedom for the refugees of the world. Our immigration numbers have been going up for over 70 years now. America gets over 1 million immigrants a year. 31.1 million foreigners live here (mind you, france's population is 60 million.) That's 31.1 million foreigners that do not want to be anywhere else. 1 million people a year agree, America kicks ass. SOURCE
Wherever there is freedom in this world, American blood has been spilled. france, Britian, North Africa, Iraq, Afghanistan, Russia, and most of North America (know your history, or read the Monroe Doctrine.

Since when has defending yourself been such a bad thing. We are not doing this for oil, or for land. The imperialist America arguement is the dumbest thing I have ever heard from those anti-American punks. If America was imperialist, do you have any idea how much land we would have? We gave Japan back all the island we fought island by island for. We do not have ANY claims in Europe or Africa, even though we have invaded them more than once. france, meanwhile, has holding all over the world. Ever heard of french-Giuana? Algeria? (click the drop down menu that says "Introduction: Colonies") There's no American-Giuana. We have a few islands, and we give them a choice every year on what to do.

America is not that bad guy in this world. Imagine a world without American inventions. Or without the freedom we have so selflessly fought for. America is great. We might not agree with what you say, but we will defend, to the death, your right to say it.

Template Changes

2005-03-07T21:11:00.000-08:00

Some template changes going on, mostly to make the website easier to read. I want to make my blog as easy to read as I can. Thats why my background is a soft blue, and not a retina-searing white or a blotchy black. Text is bigger simply because it's easier to read. Anyways, more changes coming.

Also, don't be afraid to email me, I don't bite hard. I get info and news items from you guys, and due to that fact that I don't know everything, I love to hear your opinions on the news of the day.

Smells Like Teen Spirit

2005-03-06T16:36:00.000-08:00

One thing that has always bothered me about liberals is their "sex ed" plans. These have to be the most backwards thing they have ever come up with. Earlier this week, in their unending incompetence, they thought up a bill. They say it is an anti-abortion bill. At this my bullshit meter raised a few notches, so I read on. Sure enough, the dial shot straight to "hillary clinton". She and her pinko buddies decided to guise a bill that promotes sex ed as a pro-life bill. By sex ed, they mean teaching grade school children to put condoms on cucumbers. (As reported by Michael Savage on FOX News, January 7th)

Sex education is the cause of all of these problems. How do you justify teaching kids how to have sex while saying that abstinence is the best way? This is such a hypocritical thing to do. These kids are getting mixed messages, "Don't have sex, but if you really, really want to, here is how to do it". No, why not stop it at "Don't have sex"? Then we won't have to deal with all the side effects of sex.

Sex brings about AIDS, STDs, and unwanted children. All of these things can cause abortions. This bill is securing pro-abortion views into law. It is not anti-abortion. If it was anti-abortion, it would ban the practice.

Back to the topic of sexual education. No kids are being taught abstinence anymore, because of this politically correct atmosphere we live in. Parents are not being held responsible for their children, and they should be. Parent should be teaching their kids morals and values, like abstinence. It is not the schools job to be doing this, because the schools are run by the government, and the government has an infection called liberalism.

"But some kids are going to have sex anyways" This argument is disgusting. If we all lived by the 10 commandments... But religion aside, think of all the kids that would be abstaining, but in school they are being taught sex is ok! My parents told me I could have sex, but I chose abstinence on my own accord, and I don't regret it one bit. Think of all the kids that would chose abstinence, but are being told how to have sex. Teach abstinence. If the parents want their kids to have sex (doubtful) then they better teach them how to use birth control. If not, it is the parents fault.

The Sun Is Now To Blame For Global Warming

2005-03-01T14:12:00.000-08:00

For the 3rd time today, I will post a link from Drudge. This article talks about how the northern ozone layer is being thinned, not by CO2 emissions from humans, but from the sun (probably some Republican conspiracy, or at least Bush's fault). The radical enviromentalist movement that sometimes gets more media attention than things that matter (like my lower post) tells us that we are ruining the ozone layer and causing global warming. 30 years ago we were worried about global freezing, now the earth is too warm? Either way, Bush isn't to blame, it's the sun, which is probably some vast right wing conspiracy anyways.

Iraqi's Protest... Against Terrorism

2005-03-01T12:03:00.000-08:00

Quick little link for you. Iraqis protest against terrorism, was on Drudge. Don't let the media fool you, Iraqis want us there. One other thing that came to my mind were the constant uproars whenver Bush asks for more money or troops. As far as I'm concerned, send all the troops we need to kill those bastards. The quicker we kill them, the less they kill. Anyways I'm off, Sean Hannity is on. Keep up the good fight.

Update: This link was just put up on Drudge. Lebonese people get their first taste of democracy... and thirst for more. But I thought they didn't want us.

Gay Marriage, An Oxymoron

2005-02-22T14:23:00.000-08:00

I'm not Catholic, but I know who the Pope is, and the Pope and I share some similar beliefs, both being Christian and all. Anyways, he just published his new book, and there's a section about gay marriage, which he calls part of the "ideology of evil". Now I wouldn't go that far, but they defiantly shouldn't get married.

As far as I know, homosexuality as not been proven ,or disproven, genetic or controllable. If, in the very small likely hood it was proven controllable, then it would be a completely different story. But because is has not been scientifically proven either way (though my gay friends tell me they have no control over it), we are forced to make the call based on the pretty safe assumption that it is uncontrollable. If anyone knows of a study or something done on this, I would love to see it.

Marriage, as defined by only every person in the world, is a religious ceremony that brings two people together in holy union. And as far as I know, every major religion says that homosexuality is a sin. I will get on with it, you all know the religious stuff.

That being said, don't touch my religion. The government should NOT be sticking it's hands in religion. If the ACLU can choose who it wants to defend, churches should be able to chose who they want and don't want to marry. Why would these people want a blessing from a church that considers their lifestyle a sin? It's like me asking for a liberal's blessing to write this, I want them to not like this, so why do gay people want a religious ceremony?

That is a minor point though, the biggest one is civil rights. Gay people should get the same rights as straight couples, because they have no choice. This is called a civil union. It's not religious, it has nothing to do with the church, and it gives gays the same tax and insurance rights as straight couples.

This issue is much bigger than a few paragraphs. It's a hard position to hold, but you have to stick to your guns. Just by them being gay, they counter their own equality points.

Evocreation?

2005-02-20T08:12:00.000-08:00

One of the latest things that liberals and anti-Christian groups have used to discredit Christians is science. They try to say that science proves that there is no God. They give us proof of evolution, natural selection, and how the universe began. This worked against me at first, but then I started to think.

Every time I see a new discovery, such as a sun a million times bigger than our, or the newest estimation of how massive the universe is (still dwarfed by jesse jackson's forehead though), I see God in all of it. Look around at the liberal's precious ecosystem. They tell you that it is so amazingly fragile. This fragile ecosystem as survived countless ice ages, decimation by a meteor, and nuclear weapons. Still it lives on. Did such a strong system of life arise by chance? Only an intelligent being could of created it.

Another liberal propaganda tool is evolution. I believe in evolution. I believe that when God created animals and man, He set evolution into motion, so that the animals and man would survive (remember the strong ecosystem). You can see survival of the fittest every time a liberal fails to get a spouse. Science gives examples of God's miraculous and unbounded intelligence every time it discovers something new.

One thing scientists haven't been able to touch on is the exact moment and the exact process in which the universe was created. They have actually used technology to trace the history of the universe to millimillimillimilliseconds before creation. They just cannot look back any farther. They simple answer was because there was nothing to look at. (I'm not going to source this, because it was gathered from all over, google search seconds creation big band time blablabla) Look here and tell me, what happened before 10^-43 seconds. They can't tell you either.

"But the universe wasn't created in seven days like you maniacs say! The picture you just linked proved that" You're right. To quote these guys, "the Hebrew word yom does not always signify a period of twenty-four hours." The Bible of course, was translated from Hebrew. So you would get in effect, "on the 1st yom God created Republicans, and it was awesome". Yom doesn't necessarily mean day.

Look in God in every scientific discovery you see, you will be surprised at what you will find. Science and God are not separate, as we have been raised to believe, but they are very much the same thing.

Why I Am

2005-02-15T13:40:00.000-08:00

People ask me, "Why are you so political?" or "Why are you so conservative?". The first question sickens me the most. How can you not be political? Washington DC effects every part of your life. Own a small business? I'm sure you feel every little tax increase or decrease. "But I can't vote". Right, when you turn 18, you will (if your male) be eligable for the draft. "But I still couldn't effect the government. I still can't vote". Neither could Ghandi, or the Founding Fathers. Remember "taxation without representation"? (taxation with representation isn't so fun either) "I just don't care". Then you are beyond my help, please leave America. How can you take this freedom for granted? How can you sit back in your house while other people don't even have a couch because evil tyrannical governments oppress them? Whoa... little bit to sensitive for a conservative there. Sorry.

To answer the second question, I made a list. I am conservative because...

All men, while created equal, do not become equal. In a society I believe to be good, all men would have an equal chance at succeeding or failing, on their own merits. I am not equal to Sean Hannity, or adolf hitler. I am not equal to you. Our differences is what makes America so great. When that difference is taken away, society will crumble, for all men being equal is against human instinct and nature.
Every person has the ability to succeed (blasphemy to a liberal, be careful saying that in public). To do that, you must work (another curse word in the liberal dictionary) hard. No man should be rewarded for doing nothing, and no man should be denied a deserved reward.
I believe that government should not rule the people, but the people rule the government. For without the people, what is a government? Government exists to ensure an equal opportunity for all men, and to secure man's God given rights as a human being.
I believe that the only flourishing economy is a free economy. One free of too many taxes and government regulation. When people are taxed, they are just that, taxed. When people are able to spend their money, that money circulates, and the economy grows.
I believe that a moral society is the only society worth having. Only through morals can a society survive. When a society loses those morals, they lose the fabric that holds them together.
I believe that we were created by a higher power that we do not, and will not understand. I believe that righteous and moral people have a heaven waiting for them after they die.

That being said, no one ask me again. You can ask me other stuff, I love talking to you guys. Until next update, hold onto your gun rights, you don't know when a liberal will get too close.

Bush's State of the Union

2005-02-04T13:13:00.000-08:00

President Bush gave a little schpeal the other night. The Zogby Poll said that 86% of viewers approved. I thought it was a good speech, nothing too profound though. President Bush called for reform of social security, continuation of the defense of the nation, tax cuts, and spending cuts. The former seems to take the headlines more than the others. Democrats still can't find a position on the issue. They tried reforming it during when the clintons were the President, but now they say "The facts prove that there is no imminent crisis with Social Security. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office says Social Security can pay full benefits for nearly 50 years," quothe the all-knowing charlie rangle. Wasn't it their poster boy john kerry who was calling for the reform of Social Security during the elections? Haven't they learned that two (or five) positions on one issue loses elections? The point here is, there is another reason for their switch in positions. Power.

It is not a well known fact that Members of Congress are not on the Social Security plan that the rest of the nation is on. This is just the surface. What was one of the campaign cat calls for our lesser side of the aisle during the recent campaign? "Bush will take away grandma's checks! He will eliminate Social Security! There is a crisis!" This was them trying to sway the 60+ voter base into their cesspit of liberalism. They want the credit for saving Social Security. But they want to keep it under government control, and save their power in the process. Ronald Reagan one said "Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them"

When government sticks it's hands in things, things get all covered in goo and grime. Shouldn't people be responsible for their own (haha on the radio just now some democrat saying that there is no crisis) Social Security? I personally would like the government to get out of my life and my money, but I'm just sane. Privatization might be the way to go.

The defense of America is something that should never stop. Terrorists (not insurgents or religious fanatics. Call them what they are. Political correctness is gay.) hate our way of life, they want to kill innocent people. They deserve what bomb or 5000 they get dropped on them.

E-mail me with you thoughts, I don't bite... unless your a pinko... mmmm pinkos.

Taxes are the devil!

2005-01-26T17:35:00.000-08:00

Besides the war, the economy was the biggest thing driving this past election. President Bush's handling of the economy was a constant target of liberal bantering (and flip-flopping) during the campaign. Liberals and conservatives have very differing viewpoints on how the country's money should be dealt with. A subjective view would say that the liberal stance spends more, stresses social programs, and other helpful expenditures, while the conservative side cuts spending and taxes, and stresses defense. An objective view would tell you that the liberals tax more, redistribute wealth (a decorative term for communism) , and "help" people, while the conservative takes away helpful social programs, spends too much on the military, and is pro big-money-grabbing-evil-big-brother-monster corporations.

While "helping" people, the liberal view on the economy is wrong. The purpose of government is not to stick it's grubby hands into the American People's pocket book like it has to pay for liberal programs, but to protect the people from such atrocities. Liberal social programs cost the average American money, and they only "help" a small minority of citizens. One huge money pit is welfare. This flowery idea sounds good, but think about the bigger picture. Who pays for welfare? The hard working, self made middle class. Where does the welfare money go? The low class that doesn't do anything to deserve it. Are we helping society or encouraging underproduction by paying people for doing nothing? Are they contributing to society? Doubtful. Could they? Yes. How? By paying taxes. Cut welfare benefits and you will see the unemployment rate go down like monica when hillary is out campaigning. Liberals whine, "with the unemployment rate so low, they can't get jobs!" That is the next step.

Liberals spew the almost insulting "party of the rich" and "the party of monster corporations" title at Republicans. That is probably the only true thing that comes out of the slogan-spewing cesspit liberals call their mouths. We are the party of the rich, and that's not a bad thing! The rich got that why through conservative economic policies that encouraged growth and cut their taxes! Through conservative policies people get rich. Contrary to what a bleeding-heart liberal will tell you, being rich is not the same as being evil.

Now, if businesses are encouraged to grow, they have to add employees. This opens up jobs. Businesses cannot grow if they are being taxed for everything. If you let businesses grow by not taxing them, and through incentive, they will have to pay more taxes anyways (liberals rejoice!). Here's how this ties into welfare; if a business is encouraged to grow, it adds more employees. The people on welfare will take these jobs. This creates a bigger working population (which leads to more tax revenue). People then use that money to go to college, start their own business, and become a benefit to society rather than a determint to the economy. All of this is done using conservative economic policies. Cut taxes, cut spending, and capitalism becomes a beautiful thing.

I realize that there are times when people need a little support. That is what the government is for. I just do not like the idea of every American paying for someone who is giving nothing in return. That is the biggest problem with welfare, and most social programs. Hard working Americans work 5 to 6 months out of the year to pay for taxes, and those taxes go to other people? I thought capitalism was rise or fall based on your own merits. It seems like the American People who are rising based on their merits are being dragged down by those who are falling. Cut social spending, and give it back to people who deserve it.

Conservatives want to give you back more of your money because we think you deserve it. Call us barbarians, fascists, nazis, or whatever, better one of those than wrong. We want to give you money to grow your business, improve your home, or just have fun, because we believe you should have the freedom to do that. The economy grows when taxes are cut, spending is cut, and people have more of their own money to spend. That is what America is for, not to give people free rides, but to make it possible for any person to get rich if they work hard (See I Support Dr. Condoleeza Rice)

Lighten Up Everyone...

2005-01-20T19:03:00.000-08:00

So I got my first comment a little while ago... "That is the most ass-anine thing i have ever read. (and the anonomous commenter quotes me here)"...and we are probably better than the people that hate us."" Someone can't take a joke. Never would I think that some race, religion, or ethnicity is "better" than another. What I was trying to say there was that people that hate us are probably jealous, which puts them at fault, not us. But the point was very light and subtle. Still, I was making a joke. Relax a little, laugh, its good for you. And if anyone else out there that I insulted, deal with it, and don't take it personally. "Political correctness means always having to say you're sorry"

I Support Dr. Condoleezza Rice

2005-01-19T18:05:00.000-08:00

Secretary of State Condi Rice was interrogated today. I'm not one to analyze elections, but this is why the Democrats lost. Throughout all the interrogating, I didn't hear one thing from a Democrat that hinted at a plan they had for Iraq. Sean Hannity discussed this at length, so I'm going to sum it up; No Democrat had, or has, a good, strong position on the war in Iraq, and that was the most prominent issue in the election. They haven't learned from their mistakes, and still don't have a position.

First off, let me say that Condi Rice is one of the most qualified people today to serve as Sec. of State. Anyone who says otherwise is severely misinformed. Just a few highlights of her bio:

Grew up in Birmingham, Alabama. This city was called the "worst city for race relations" by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. The house across the street from her's was fire bombed, and she lost a good friend to a bomb thrown in a church. Bull Connor, the police chief of the city, would drive around in an all white tank.
Professor of Political Science, cum laude, Phi Betta Kappa
Bush 41's Director, then Senior Director of Soviet and East European Affairs during German reunification and the final days of the soviet empire.. Also Special Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs.
Special Assistant to the Director of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in 1986.
Member of countless Board of Directors.
Honorary Doctorates from several universities

Compare this to barbara boxer or john kerry's resume (member of communist hall of fame doesn't count).

Liberals hate Condi Rice because she is the embodiment of conservative ideals. She came from a rough background, worked hard, and became an amazing success. That's right, if someone works hard, they will succeed in American Capitalism (contrary to popular media belief). If you don't work hard, you fail. Condi worked hard, and was very successful. She's also black. I will say it, Condi Rice is black. I am not racist, but I will not deny an obvious fact. Bush has been called a racist, a nazi, whatever. Condi Rice is black. Liberals can't stand losing that voter base. Or they are racist. (That's a joke, don't email me.)

Dr. Rice's performance at the interrogations was amazing in its own. barbara boxer did everything except call her a liar flat out. They reamed into her, and she maintained her poise, her positions, and didn't let it get to her. When she was encountered with the problem of Iran, she said “It is really hard to find common ground with a government that thinks Israel should be extinguished,” supports terrorist groups and is undercutting U.S. peace efforts in the Middle East. She couldn't be more right.

Condi's positions on the issues, her poise, intelligence, and her personality all make her a great candidate for Secretary of State. To combat all the liberal hatred for her, I will proudly say: Condoleezza Rice, I support you.

Proverbs 14:34

2005-01-15T10:02:00.000-08:00

So one of the latest headlines about Bush concerns him saying that he couldn't imagine being President without believing in God. This started a whole uproar over religion and how he shouldn't be so outspoken blah blah blah. Just a thought, if he would of said he was Muslim, would they still bash him? The latest trend seems to be Christian bashing, and religion bashing in general, even though Christians get the brunt of it. I think the people bash Christians for the same reason people hate America, because we are the majority, and we are probably better than the people that hate us.

This last Christmas was a constant assault on religion. Several department stores (including Macy's) took down their "Merry Christmas" banners, because they offend people. High School bands were not aloud to play "religiously themed songs". God-forbid that high-schoolers play "Silent Night" but let eminem and his rap buddies "sing" about raping women, shooting cops, doing drugs, and killing your mom (the video shoes several clips of the world's favorite wigger burying his mom in his backyard... no offense to people who are actually black. I love black people.)

Seriously, what's wrong with religion? It instills morals and values, helps you though troubled times, and gives hope. People do great things because of religion; Gandhi, Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., Mother Teresa, the Founding Fathers, all deeply religious. These are some of history's greatest figures, and all of them believed.

With the recent tsunami, churches are banding together to help give aid the victims (Habitat for Humanity, and The Salvation Army to name a couple) Youth groups teach kids values, give them good friends, and keep them away from drugs, sex, and getting into trouble. If you go to church, you give one hour a week, and if there is an afterlife, good for you, and if not, you lived a happy and fulfilling life. Churches do not kill anyone, they help people. Churches host AA, support groups, and kid's street hockey. Meanwhile, liberals protect abortion, try to legalize weed and gay marriage, and say it's society's fault that criminals commit crimes (they should of gone to church). Quoth the great Ronald Reagan, "We should start with the Ten Commandments. If we lived by the Golden Rule, there would be no need for other laws."

That being said, what's wrong with religion in the government? Cry the liberal, "separation of church and state!" When the colonists revolted against the British, the church and the state were the same thing. You paid taxes to the church and the state. This gave the state control over religion (indulgences), and it could make people believe what it wanted to believe. This lead to corruption in the church, which should be immune to it, but the money/power factor infected the church. This is why the colonists wanted a separation of church and state. They WANTED religious values in the constitution, that's why Jefferson said "endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights"! If he wanted separation of church and state like liberals say, he would not have said that in the only document that mentions separation of church and state. (Yes, separation of church and state isn't even mentioned in the Constitution, only in the Declaration of Independence)

Let's take a closer look at the Declaration. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men". The big line there, "That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men". Jefferson thought that government's purpose was to secure rights given by God. Separation of church and state? Far from it. ""Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams

I ask again, what's wrong with politicians who believe in God? If slick willy would of had a strong faith he wouldn't of slept with monica and end up spending a whole bunch of taxpayer money on trials (it's a joke, laugh). If anything, Washington could benefit greatly from more religion, and so could the world.

Abortion... slang for legal murder.

2005-01-12T17:19:00.000-08:00

1/3 of my generation has been killed, yes killed, by abortion. Think about that for a minute. 1/3 of people born around 1982 have been aborted. If you have 3 siblings, one of you is gone. Take your 3 best friends, now kill one. This would solve the social security crisis, but that isn't important compared to this. Just to show you what we are dealing with, I have some pictures. They are graphic, violent, and disturbing. You have been warned. **GRAPHIC PHOTOS** When someone has an abortion, they are killing a helpless child. This post will be humorless and graphic. Such is the subject.

A small child cannot speak for itself, and there is no one there to speak for it. That child has every right to life guaranteed by the Constitution (most notably the 14th Amendment, read it). By making abortion legal, the State is depriving that child it's most basic right as a human being, Life. We are all endowed by our Creator with that basic right to life, amongst others, and this cold blooded act of murder deprives our nation's most precious gifts of that life. Children will grow up to be this country, they will have fun, they will cry, laugh, smile, and frown just like all of us. Living, breathing people are killed by this "operation". 22 days into development, there is a heart beat. By 40 days, brain waves can be recorded (this includes pain). Facial features are apparent at 6 and a half weeks. By 8 weeks all body systems are functioning.

Killing is not the right word for what happens to these babies. Liberals whine about the "torture" that the prisoners at Abu Gharib undergo, yet they let this go on. The most widely known abortion "technique" is partial-birth, mainly because of it's violence. In a partial-birth abortion, the baby's neck is cut open and it's brains are sucked through a vacuum. Sometimes the babies are so developed that the "doctor (clinic code for murderer)" has to insert a rod through the "soft spot" of a newborn's skull and scramble the brains. There are other methods, including one in which the baby is drowned and burned to death in a highly acidic saltine solution. Occasionally, the baby thrashes around inside the mother because of the pain and lack of oxygen to the brain.

Defenders of abortion give many arguments. One of the most common is the mother's health. This has to be the single most selfish excuse for anything. Killing your own child to save your own health. The audacity of some people is amazing, in this case disgusting. But lets think about this for a bit. Does an abortion really preserve the mothers health? One type of abortion previously mentioned involves filling the "patient" up with a highly acidic saltine solution. This sounds healthy. Then maybe they can stick some scissors up there, maybe a scalpel. Then after that, we can stick some pliers in you and unnaturally yank a baby out. Mother's health? Google "abortion health risks". Take the word's of abortion advocate's themselves: "An abortion kills the life of a baby after it has begun. It is dangerous to your life and health." -Planned Parenthood 'Plan Your Children' pamphlet, 1963.

Physical risks are not the only thing. Imagine having a baby thrash inside of you, dieing of suffocation and acid burns, because you don't want to give birth to it. Over 70% of women in a recent poll answered strongly agree or agree to "The memory of my abortion is very clear". Almost every women said that they experienced guilt, depression, anger, and sorrow after the abortion. 84.8% of women said they felt regret. 91% felt shame. 76% felt self-hatred. Almost 70% fear retribution from God. 82% felt a lower self-esteem. These statistics go on and on in this poll. Mental health after an abortion is an issue. I believe everyone should at least look at this poll. It tells you a lot about what kind of procedure this is.

Excuses. People will say that "ohhh, well what about rape?". Rape and incest are the cause of 1% of all abortions. Some people will say they can't afford a baby now. That is a horrible reason. You are killing a helpless child because you don't have enough money? Why the hell are you having sex? Get this new and profound idea: If you don't want a child, don't have sex. This post is getting lengthy, but this subject is never ending. I have presented a fraction of the case. The real case should be presented by all the murdered children that could of been lawyers, Gandhi’s, Martin Luther Kings, or Jefferson's. I will end this with a quote by the great Ronald Wilson Reagan. "Abortion is advocated only by persons who have themselves been born."

Abortion links:
http://womensissues.about.com/cs/abortionstats/a/aaabortionstats.htm
http://www.rtl.org/
http://www.cirtl.org/syndrome.htm
http://www.wprc.org/21.45.0.0.1.0.phtml
http://www.nurturingnetwork.org/HealthRisks.htm
(I love google, you should too)

The UN

2005-01-10T13:52:00.000-08:00

I find that the UN is a fun target, because people seem to have been brainwashed to think "Oh everyone united for peace! What a good idea!" which is a great idea, but its how you go about it. First off let me say that America is the greatest country on earth. We spend more money on defense than the next 9 countries combined. We give the UN 22% of it's funding, the most of any country (compared to France's 6.5% and Germany's 9.8%). Here are some other interesting facts about the united nations:

In May of 2001, America was voted OFF of the UN human rights board, which is chaired by the world's beacon for humanitarianism, Libya (for those of you who can't figure that one out, it was sarcastic).
The Disarmament Commission is headed by the country that has gassed it's own people, disobeyed 14 UN resolutions (more on that later), and was ruled by a brutal dictator. Iraq. The very country that was told 14 times to disarm headed the disarmament commission. It's like a serial murderer being the judge in his own case. (Last two sourced as Sean Hannity's Deliver Us From Evil)

The UN is awash in scandal. The oil-for-food scandal for instance (not to mention all the sex scandals). Really, I don't care how much the UN lost or gained, if someone besides people living in poor conditions got a nickel, that someone needs an ass whooping (preferably administered by America, cuz we are getting quite good at it). If the UN can't give food to poor people, I don't want to trust them with our national security.

America does not need this burden to drag around. When we went into Afghanistan, the UN was saying "You cannot, you need our approval". Same thing with Iraq. sec. general kofi annan still thinks that the war in Iraq needs his approval. Who does he think he is? The President of the United States? He, nor any foreigner should have ANY say in the defense of our nation. On 9/11 we were attacked, we have the right to go around kicking anyone's ass we feel, including the dixie chicks. Since 9/11, we haven't been attacked by any terrorists. Isael, on the other hand, following the UN's advice and holding back on palastine, is attacked every time you open the paper (now that arafat is dead, maybe things will get better). The terrorists would of attacked us again, but they have an obstacle in the way, THEY ARE DEAD.

So, what does the UN do? Heh, I don't know. They send UN Peacekeeping Troops (Code for "American Troop Donations") around the world and say "Stop terrorists, and we won't hurt you... wait no, don't bomb innocent civilians... stop... we will sic france on you, no be a good terrorist." Terrorists speak one language, the language of force. After America spoke that language and killed them, Libya gave up it's nuclear arms, north korea's tone softened, and france kept whining. Let's look at a specific recent instance, Iraq. The UN passes 14 resolutions tell saddam to stop invading, stop gassing his own people, and being a general asshole. After they passed the 6 or 7th, I think he realized that they weren't gonna do anything. Then America threatened invasion and he thought "They haven't done anything before." He was wrong. Now 25 million Iraqis are free, more people than the UN has ever liberated. Other things the UN has messed up:

Rwanda genocide
Somalia Fiasco
Thailand child sex trade
Current mass murders and enslavement taking place in Sudan

The UN is consistently anti-American, they tried to kick us out even though we are its biggest supporters (it's headquarters are even in New York City... right next to the World Trade Centers...), and the reason for what effectiveness it has. Only when we go out on our own without the UN does anything ever get done. Do I think we should leave the UN? Yep. Would the UN fail if we left? Probably. Will world peace fail? ...We have world peace?

start-up

2005-01-01T22:49:00.000-08:00

Ok so I'm putting this up, so I can start messing with the template and getting things in order. No one is gonna read this post, so I'm not going to write anything.